Augste-Felix-Charles de Beaupoil, Count of Saint-Aulaire, became ambassador to Romania in the troubled summer of 1916.
Auguste-Felix-Charles de Beaupoil, Count of Saint-Aulaire, was born in 1866 and died in 1954. He arrived as ambassador to Romania in the troubled summer of 1916, when Romania joined the fray in WWI. He wrote his recollections of that time in a book called "Notes of an Ambassador of Yore. In Romania, 1916-1920". The book is one of the most important and poignant sources documenting political games and tragedies that occurred towards the end of the war. He loved Romania, was an anti-communist and advocated Romania's joining the war. He had a sharp analytical spirit, and was a visionary when it came to the course of history.
Historian Alina Pavelescu recommends that we read Saint-Aulaire's book twice:
"The first fragment I read tells about his visit to the office of Aristide Briand, before going to Romania, and he says about the latter that 'the man's desk was as bereft of papers as his own head was of ideas'. Right away I started liking him a lot, and I thought that he deserved the gratitude of everyone who puts off forever putting order in the papers on their desk. I recommend that you read this book twice. The first reading is very easy for us Romanians, because it is favorable to us. It is more favorable to us in many situations than the memoirs of many Romanians of the time, because this Saint-Aulaire loved Queen Marie of Romania. He says extraordinarily beautiful things about the Romanians' capacity for sacrifice, and their generosity in sacrifice. He speaks about the Romanian political class in terms that we are not used to. It is flattering to read Saint-Aulaire when he says these things about Romanians, considering how critical he was the of the French political class."
The Count of Saint-Aulaire showed remarkable understanding of the world in which he arrived. Alina Pavelescu believes that the second reading helps us see better into the writer's observations:
"I recommend a second reading, because the Count of Saint-Aulaire is only in appearance an easy source to identify within that landscape. Why? Because he is an aristocrat representing a republic, he is a conservative who is a diplomat on behalf of a left wing government, he is a civilian who feels boxed in, alongside many others, in an environment dominated by the army, by soldiers and their logic. We know how the story ends, but when we read his memoirs, we don't know how it all ends. It is true that he writes in 1953, he is saddened by the fate of Greater Romania, he has confirmations regarding the harsh judgment he issued after WWI. He doesn't know, however, how the world ended up after the success of the USSR in WWII. Every time, the reader is taken through several stages in which we don't know how the story ends. Being French, he came from a society which, at some point, was much more favorable towards the Russians than towards Romanians. The French loved the Russians, maybe they still love them, much more than we Romanians ever loved them. Saint-Aulaire does not have the sin of Russophilia, I would say rather the opposite, he had no illusions about Tsarist Russia either when he dealt in Bucharest with Russia's representatives negotiating Romania's entry into the war."
Literary historian Dan C. Mihailescu told us about the way in which others saw Saint-Aulaire:
"I. G. Duca knows very well how to carry himself around diplomats, he is very clever in reading their gestures and their words, and compares Russia's Poplevski, who was discredited by his fellow Bolsheviks, to Britain's Lord Barclay, who was under the influence of Jean Chrissoveloni. And he writes about Saint-Aulaire: 'My God, was that man honest!'. Like all Frenchmen, he didn't know how to adapt. To adapt to the transactional nature of Romanians, to their two faced nature, was very hard for him. Poor Saint-Aulaire, he didn't know how to maneuver among Marghiloman's and Carp's conservatives, who were Germanophile, and the Francophiles Bratianu, Duca, Queen Marie and Barbu Stirbey. Little by little, Duca showed him how to adapt to expectations, and the Frenchman became an expert in the mercantile psychology of Romanians.
As we can see in these memoirs, the Count of Saint-Aulaire was a visionary, he had the ability to anticipate the failure of communism, as Dan Mihailescu told us. Saint-Aulaire's book is a book written by a man who understood the world he lived in, and who saw into the future.
Useful Links
Copyright © . All rights reserved